The Comma Johanneum: The History and Controversy Behind 1 John 5:7-8

It often disturbs some devout Christians to learn that parts of 1 John 5, verses 7 and 8, as found in the King James Version and New King James Version, are actually present in only a handful of Greek manuscripts of the New Testament. Could you kindly elaborate more on this?
The passage in question, commonly referred to as the Comma Johanneum, is found in 1 John 5, verses 7 and 8 in the King James Version (KJV) and the New King James Version (NKJV). Here’s how it reads in those translations:
“For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.”

The specific portion that is controversial is:

”…the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.”

This specific wording is not found in the majority of early Greek manuscripts of the New Testament. The Comma Johanneum is absent from nearly all Greek manuscripts before the 14th and 15th centuries.

1. Earliest Manuscripts: The earliest and most reliable Greek manuscripts of 1 John (such as the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus from the 4th century) do not contain the Comma Johanneum.
2. Church Fathers: Early church fathers like Origen, Cyprian, and Augustine also do not quote this Trinitarian formula, suggesting it was not present in the manuscripts available to them.
3. Latin Tradition: The Comma Johanneum appears in some Latin manuscripts from the 4th century onward, primarily in the writings of certain Latin theologians. It was included in later Latin translations, particularly those influenced by the Vulgate.
4. Introduction into Greek Texts: The insertion of the Comma into Greek manuscripts is believed to have occurred during the Middle Ages, significantly influenced by the Latin tradition. Its occurrence is limited to a small number of late medieval Greek manuscripts, specifically approximately seven to eight in total.

The King James Version translators in the early 17th century relied heavily on the Textus Receptus, a Greek text compiled by Erasmus in the early 1500s. Erasmus’s initial editions of the Textus Receptus did not contain the Comma Johanneum, since he found no Greek manuscript that included it. Under pressure from certain theologians and after being shown a Greek manuscript (likely created for this purpose), he included it in his third edition (1522). This inclusion led to its presence in the King James Version.

Most modern Bible translations (such as the NIV, ESV, NASB, and NRSV) exclude the Comma Johanneum or place it in a footnote, recognizing that it is not supported by the earliest and most reliable manuscripts.

Conclusion

The inclusion of the Comma Johanneum in both the King James Version and the New King James Version reflects historical context rather than original authenticity. Although this may be troubling for some Christians, it underscores the complexities involved in the transmission of biblical texts. Unlike most modern translations, its presence in these versions stems from varying manuscript traditions, and scholars largely agree that it was added to the text of 1 John at a later date.

Download the PDF book: Early Christian Doctrines
Download the PDF book: Early Christian Doctrines

Who were the Unitarian scholars among Christians prior to the establishment of the Nicene Creed?

Who were the Unitarian scholars among Christians prior to the establishment of the Nicene Creed?

Prior to the formulation of the Nicene Creed in 325 CE, certain Christian scholars and theologians expressed Unitarian beliefs, focusing on the singularity of God and rejecting the doctrines of the Trinity. These figures typically aligned with early theological traditions that emphasized the Father as the sole God. Some of these individuals include:

1. Theodotus of Byzantium (late 2nd century):

Theodotus taught that Jesus was a man who was adopted as the Son of God at his baptism (“Adoptionism”). He rejected the idea of Jesus being divine by nature, affirming the singularity of God, and was excommunicated for his views.

2. Paul of Samosata (3rd century):

Paul, a bishop of Antioch, was a key figure in early Christian Monarchianism, emphasizing the unity of God. He taught that Jesus was a man endowed with divine wisdom and power but not preexistent or divine in nature. His views were condemned at the Synod of Antioch (268 CE).

3. Artemon (2nd–3rd century):

Artemon is associated with a form of Monarchianism, maintaining that early Christian doctrine affirmed that Jesus was merely human and not divine. He argued that the belief in Christ’s divinity was a later development.

4. Ebionites (1st–4th centuries):

The Ebionites were an early Jewish-Christian group that rejected the divinity of Jesus and the preexistence doctrine. They viewed Jesus as a prophet and the Messiah but emphasized the absolute unity of God.

5. Photinus of Sirmium:

Photinus was a 4th-century bishop who rejected the Trinity, viewing God as a singular entity rather than three distinct persons. His beliefs conflicted with orthodox Christian teachings, particularly the Nicene Creed established in 325 AD, which affirmed the Trinitarian view. Photinus emphasized God's unity but was eventually condemned as a heretic by the Church for opposing the established doctrine.

6. Origen (184–253 CE):

Although Origen is often considered a precursor to later Trinitarian thought, he also emphasized the subordination of the Son to the Father. His theological framework left room for interpretations that leaned toward a Unitarian understanding of the supremacy of the Father.

7. Arianism and Arius (c. 250–336 CE):

Arius, though post-Nicene, was active before the council and denied the co-eternity and consubstantiality of the Son with the Father. He argued that the Son was created by the Father and therefore subordinate, aligning with a Unitarian emphasis on God’s singularity.

8. Early Jewish Christians:

Many early Jewish Christians, including those in the Nazarean and Ebionite communities, maintained strict monotheism. They rejected the idea of Jesus’ divinity and upheld the belief in God as a singular being.

These figures and groups represent diverse streams of early Christian thought that diverged from the later Trinitarian orthodoxy solidified at the Council of Nicaea. Their beliefs highlight the rich and contested theological debates of early Christianity.

Differences between Christianity and Judaism in their beliefs about the Holy Spirit

What are the differences between Christianity and Judaism in their beliefs about the Holy Spirit? What are the key theological distinctions between Judaism and Christianity regarding the Holy Spirit?

Christianity and Judaism have fundamentally different understandings of the Holy Spirit, despite sharing some common scriptural roots.

In Judaism, the Holy Spirit (ruach ha-kodesh) is understood as a divine force or manifestation of God's power and influence in the world. Key aspects of the Jewish view include:

1. Divine Force: The Holy Spirit is seen as God's divine quality and influence over the universe and His creatures, not as a distinct person or being.

2. Prophetic Gift: The Holy Spirit is primarily associated with prophecy, wisdom, and divine inspiration. It was believed to rest upon prophets and worthy individuals, but its presence was not permanent.

4. Manifestation of God: Rather than being a separate entity, the Holy Spirit is viewed as a way God intersects with the physical world.

Christianity developed a more personalized and distinct conception of the Holy Spirit:

1. Divine Person: Christians view the Holy Spirit as the third person of the Trinity, co-equal and co-eternal with God the Father and God the Son.

2. Permanent Indwelling: In Christian theology, the Holy Spirit permanently dwells within believers after they accept Christ, serving as a seal of their salvation.

3. Personal Attributes: Christianity attributes personal characteristics to the Holy Spirit, including:
- Teaching and guiding believers
- Comforting and advocating
- Convicting of sin
- Enabling spiritual gifts

Key Distinctions

Nature of Being: The fundamental difference lies in personhood - Judaism sees the Holy Spirit as a divine force, while Christianity views it as a divine person.

Relationship to God: In Judaism, the Holy Spirit is a manifestation of God's power, while in Christianity, it is understood as a distinct person within the unified Godhead.

Role in Believers: Judaism views the Holy Spirit as an occasional gift for specific purposes, while Christianity teaches it as a permanent indwelling presence for all believers.


How does Surah 16, verse 102 in the Quran relate to the concept of the Holy Spirit in Judaism?

Surah 16, verse 102 of the Quran states:

"Say, ˹O Prophet,˺, the Holy Spirit has brought it (the Quran) down from your Lord in truth to reassure the believers and as a guide and good news for those who submit ˹to Allah˺."
This verse highlights the "Holy Spirit" (Ruh al-Qudus) as the agent through which divine revelation is delivered to the Prophet Muhammad. Islamic tradition generally identifies the "Holy Spirit" as the angel Jibreel (Gabriel), who is responsible for conveying God's messages to prophets.

In Judaism, the concept of the "Holy Spirit" (Ruach HaKodesh) carries a somewhat different connotation. In Jewish understanding, Ruach HaKodesh refers to God's divine inspiration and presence that enables individuals to perceive and convey His will. It is more of a manifestation of divine influence rather than a distinct being or angel. The Holy Spirit operates as a means to inspire prophecy, guide moral behavior, and provide wisdom.

Relation Between the Two Concepts:

1. Divine Source: In both Islam and Judaism, the Holy Spirit (Ruh al-Qudus/Ruach HaKodesh) is directly connected to divine will and revelation. In the Quranic context, this spirit ensures the delivery of divine truth, while in Judaism, it inspires prophets and righteous individuals to act in accordance with God's will.

2. Role in Prophecy and Revelation: The Quranic Ruh al-Qudus (identified with Gabriel) functions as the intermediary delivering God's words to the Prophet Muhammad. In Judaism, Ruach HaKodesh is connected with inspiring prophets, including figures such as Moses, and enabling them to communicate God's will or record sacred scriptures.

3. Divine Guidance: Both traditions see the Holy Spirit as a means of divine guidance, offering reassurance and support to believers. In Surah 16, verse 102, the Holy Spirit brings the Quran to "reassure the believers," while in Judaism, Ruach HaKodesh provides wisdom and strength to those who seek to align with God’s commands.

Although the terms overlap conceptually in being mechanisms for divine interaction with humanity, the Quran emphasizes the Holy Spirit as a distinct entity (angel Gabriel), whereas in Judaism, Ruach HaKodesh represents God's divine energy or presence manifesting in the world.