The Fulfillment of Prophecy: The Jewish Rabbi’s Admiration for Islam’s Sacrificial Legacy

Religious traditions frequently assert their divine fulfillment, searching for validation of their legitimacy and divine favor within their scriptures.

A notably significant moment in Islamic history illustrates this dynamic—when a Jewish rabbi came to Caliph ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb with a remarkable confession: “If a verse like this had been revealed to us Jews, we would have declared the day of its revelation a festival day.” The verse in question is from Surah al-Mā’idah (5:3):

“This day I have perfected for you your religion, completed My favor upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion.”
This Quranic declaration came during the Prophet Muhammad’s final pilgrimage (Ḥajj), marking the formal completion of Islam as a revealed religion. But why would a Jewish rabbi regard this verse with such admiration—perhaps even envy? To understand this, we must explore a prophetic verse from the Hebrew Bible, found in Isaiah 60:7, and analyze how Islamic rituals, particularly the Ḥajj, embody the prophetic vision better than the expectations of either Judaism or Christianity.

Isaiah 60:7 – A Sacrificial Vision Involving Arabs

The Hebrew verse in Isaiah reads:

“All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee: they shall come up with acceptance on Mine altar, and I will glorify the house of My glory.”

(Isaiah 60:7)
This verse envisions a time when the descendants of Kedar and Nebaioth, two sons of Ishmael (Genesis 25:13), will offer sacrifices acceptable to God. The mention of “Mine altar” and “house of My glory” is generally understood by Jewish commentators to refer to the Temple in Jerusalem, where animal sacrifices were once offered according to the Torah.

Yet, the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE left a void in Jewish religious life. Without the altar, the sacrificial system central to the Mosaic covenant could no longer be practiced. Jews have since longed for the rebuilding of the Third Temple, expecting the resumption of sacrificial rites in fulfillment of such prophetic verses.

But here lies the tension: the sacrificial act involving the Ishmaelite tribes—Arabs from the lineage of Kedar and Nebaioth—has not been realized in Judaism. Instead, it is in Islam’s Ḥajj rituals, especially the ʿEid al-Aḍḥā sacrifice, that this prophecy seems to find a living expression.

Islam’s Living Sacrifice: A Fulfillment of Isaiah?

During the annual pilgrimage in Mecca, Muslims from all over the world—many of them literal descendants of Ishmael—participate in animal sacrifices in remembrance of Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice his son (identified in Islam as Ishmael, not Isaac). These animals are offered near the Kaʿbah, the sanctuary Muslims believe was originally built by Abraham and Ishmael.

The connection becomes theologically provocative:

Kedar and Nebaioth: Represent Ishmaelite tribes, settled in the Arabian Peninsula.

Offerings accepted on the altar: The animals offered during Ḥajj are intended as acts of devotion to God, distributed to the poor in a ritual of divine acceptance.

“House of My glory”: In Islamic interpretation, this refers not to the destroyed Temple in Jerusalem, but to the Kaʿbah in Mecca—revived and purified by Prophet Muhammad, a descendant of Ishmael.

This paradigm effectively transfers the axis of prophetic fulfillment from Jerusalem to Mecca, and from Temple Judaism to Islam. The Jewish rabbi, recognizing this shift, would understandably feel a mix of reverence and regret—hence his comment to ʿUmar.

Christianity and the Sacrifice: Atonement Without Altars

Christianity diverges sharply in interpreting sacrificial themes. For most Christians, Jesus’ crucifixion is understood as the once-for-all sacrifice that atones for sin, rendering animal offerings obsolete:

“We have been made holy through the sacrifice of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.”

(Hebrews 10:10)
Thus, Isaiah 60:7, with its focus on physical offerings and ritual sacrifice, is often spiritualized or placed in an eschatological future. Some Christian theologians believe it refers to Arab conversion to Christianity in the end times, where the imagery of Kedar and Nebaioth signifies a gentile embrace of the Gospel.

Yet, the explicit association with animal sacrifice, a practice explicitly abandoned in Christian theology, remains problematic for this interpretation. Islam, by contrast, continues the sacrificial rites within a monotheistic framework that maintains Abrahamic purity and the legacy of Ishmael.

The Quranic Rebuttal: Abraham Was Neither Jew Nor Christian

The Qur’an addresses this theological contention directly in Surah Āl ʿImrān (3:67):

“Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but he was a monotheist, submitting to God (a Muslim), and he was not of the polytheists.”
Islam positions itself not as a new religion but as the restoration of the pure monotheism of Abraham, inclusive of the sacrificial rites and covenantal practices once diluted or abandoned by later traditions.

Conclusion: A Verse to Be Envied

The statement of the Jewish rabbi to ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb reflects a profound religious realization: Islam had fulfilled a prophecy that Jews were still awaiting. The verse in Surah 5:3, revealed during the Prophet’s final pilgrimage, proclaims the completion of divine religion and favor:

“This day I have perfected for you your religion, completed My favor upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion.”
This stands in sharp contrast to Judaism’s waiting for the Third Temple and Christianity’s departure from sacrificial rites. Islam emerges as the living continuation of Abrahamic worship—including the role of Ishmael’s descendants—thus embodying both the form and spirit of prophetic visions such as Isaiah 60:7.

In the end, it is not merely doctrinal differences, but the embodiment of prophecy in historical and living religious practice, that made that verse in the Qur’an the object of such profound rabbinic envy.

The Prophecy of Hagar and Its Fulfillment: A Comparative Analysis of Genesis 21:18 and Isaiah 60:7

There is a belief that the prophecy of Hagar in Genesis 21, verse 18, holds more weight than Isaiah 60, verse 7, which is linked to and completes the former. How is this understanding conveyed?

The belief that the prophecy of Hagar in Genesis 21, verse 18, holds more weight than Isaiah 60, verse 7, which is linked to and completes the former, can be understood through a close examination of the biblical texts and their contexts. Here’s how this understanding is conveyed:

Genesis 21, verse 18 (The Prophecy of Hagar).
This verse is part of the story where God speaks to Hagar after she and her son, Ishmael, are sent away by Abraham. Hagar is distraught, fearing for her son’s life in the desert.

The verse reads:

“Arise, lift up the lad, and hold him in thine hand; for I will make him a great nation.”
This prophecy directly promises that Ishmael will become a great nation. This is a foundational promise, as it assures Hagar of her son’s future and his importance in God’s plan.

Isaiah 60, verse 7 (Completion of the Prophecy). This chapter of Isaiah deals with the future glory of Zion, depicting a time of great prosperity and the gathering of nations to honor God.
The verse reads:

“All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered together unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee: they shall come up with acceptance on mine altar, and I will glorify the house of my glory.”
Both Kedar and Nebaioth are descendants of Ishmael. This verse indicates the fulfillment and continuation of the promise given to Hagar, showing that Ishmael’s descendants will play a significant role in the future worship and honor of God.

Interconnection and Weight: The prophecy in Genesis 21, verse 18, is seen as having “more weight” because it is the initial divine promise regarding Ishmael, establishing his importance and future. It is a direct communication from God to Hagar at a crucial moment. Isaiah 60, verse 7, is viewed as the completion or continuation of this promise. It confirms and elaborates on the fulfillment of God’s plan for Ishmael’s descendants, showing their eventual integration into the worship of God and their contribution to the glory of Zion.
The “weight” of Genesis 21, verse 18, lies in its foundational nature, while Isaiah 60, verse 7, provides a more detailed and expanded vision of the fulfillment of that initial promise.

This understanding is conveyed by recognizing that the original promise to Hagar is the cornerstone of the prophecy concerning Ishmael and his descendants.

The later prophetic vision in Isaiah builds upon this foundation, demonstrating the fulfillment of God’s promise in a broader and more comprehensive way. Therefore, while Isaiah 60, verse 7 is significant in its completion of the prophecy, Genesis 21, verse 18, holds a primary and foundational weight in the narrative.

The Apostle Paul and the people of Kedar

Paul claimed that he was an apostle to the Gentiles. What was his connection to the people of Kedar, who were Gentiles and would enter God’s fold as predicted in Isaiah 42 verse 11 and Isaiah 60 verse 7? Kedar was the son of Ishmael, the ancestor of the Arab people.

This is a very interesting question. Paul was an apostle to the Gentiles, meaning that he preached the gospel of Jesus Christ to the non-Jewish nations. He traveled extensively throughout the Roman Empire, visiting places such as Cyprus, Asia Minor, Greece, Macedonia, and Rome. He also wrote many letters to the churches he founded or visited, which are part of the New Testament. While Paul’s ministry was mainly directed towards the Gentiles in various regions, there is no specific mention or connection between Paul and the people of Kedar in the New Testament.

The people of Kedar were a nomadic tribe of Arabs, descended from Ishmael, the son of Abraham and Hagar. They are mentioned several times in the Old Testament as examples of the distant nations that would worship the true God. Isaiah 42 verse 11 and Isaiah 60 verse 7 are two of the prophecies that foretell the inclusion of the people of Kedar in God’s salvation plan.

The references to Kedar in Isaiah are prophecies that speak about the inclusion of Gentiles into God’s fold. These prophecies imply that people from various nations, including the descendants of Kedar, would come to worship and acknowledge God.

Although Paul’s mission was to bring the message of salvation to the Gentiles, his primary interactions were with the Greco-Roman world rather than specific Arab or Ishmaelite communities. However, there is no specific mention of Paul having a direct connection to the people of Kedar mentioned in those specific verses of Isaiah.

Isaiah 60:7 and the Christian Belief in Jesus’ Sacrificial Atonement

Some scholars argue that Isaiah 60, verse 7, which predicts the restoration of animal sacrifices, contradicts the Christian belief in the sacrificial death of Jesus as the ultimate atonement for humanity’s sins. According to this Christian perspective, Jesus’ sacrifice negates the necessity for the Old Testament sacrifices. What is the basis of the arguments presented by these scholars?

Isaiah 60, verse 7, states:

“All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered to you; the rams of Nebaioth shall minister to you; they shall come up with acceptance on my altar, and I will beautify my glorious house.”
This verse has prompted debates among scholars, particularly regarding its implications for the Christian belief in Jesus’ sacrificial death as the ultimate atonement for humanity’s sins. Here’s the basis of their argument:

1. Literal Interpretation of the Prophecy

Some scholars argue that Isaiah 60, verse 7, predicts a literal restoration of Old Testament animal sacrifices. This interpretation suggests a future scenario where temple rituals, including offerings, are reintroduced. For Christians who believe Jesus’ death was the ultimate and final atonement for sin (Hebrews 10, verses 10 to 18), this interpretation seems contradictory, as it implies that these sacrifices in Isaiah retain some salvific value.

2. Theological Implications

If Isaiah 60, verse 7, indeed prophesies the reinstatement of animal sacrifices, it raises questions about the sufficiency of Jesus’ sacrifice. Central to Christian theology is the belief that Jesus’ crucifixion fulfilled and replaced the sacrificial system outlined in the Old Testament (Matthew 5, verse 17; John 19, verse 30). Any reintroduction of sacrifices could imply that Jesus’ atonement was incomplete, directly challenging key doctrines of salvation and the New Covenant.

3. Symbolic vs. Literal:

Many Christian scholars interpret Isaiah 60, verse 7 symbolically rather than literally. They argue that the reference to sacrifices and altars is metaphorical, symbolizing worship, devotion, and the gathering of nations to God. In this view, the verse does not predict a literal return to Old Testament sacrificial practices but reflects the restoration and glorification of God’s people in a spiritual sense.

4. Eschatological Considerations

For Christians, eschatological theology plays a critical role in understanding Isaiah 60, verse 7. Some argue that if this prophecy is taken literally, it contradicts the belief that Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection were the ultimate and final means of atonement. This creates tension between a literal interpretation of the verse and the Christian doctrine of salvation.

5. Comparative Religious Perspective: Eid al-Adha

Interestingly, some Islamic scholars view the prophecy of Isaiah 60, verse 7, as aligning more closely with Islamic traditions, particularly the celebration of Eid al-Adha (the Feast of Sacrifice). This festival commemorates Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice his son Ishmael in obedience to God and involves the offering of animals as part of worship. From this perspective, the prophecy of Isaiah 60, verse 7, reflects a continuation of sacrificial practices consistent with Islamic beliefs, contrasting with the Christian claim that Jesus’ death replaced all sacrifices.

Conclusion

The interpretation of Isaiah 60, verse 7, presents a theological challenge, particularly for Christian doctrines concerning the sufficiency of Jesus’ sacrificial death. A literal understanding of the verse raises questions about the necessity and effectiveness of Jesus’ crucifixion as the final and complete sacrifice for sin.


However, alternative interpretations—such as symbolic readings or eschatological frameworks—allow many Christians to reconcile this passage with their beliefs. Meanwhile, comparative religious perspectives, such as those from Islam, offer alternative understandings that highlight the complexity and depth of this biblical prophecy.