A Comparative Analysis of the Gospel of Paul and the Teachings of Jesus

Some believe that the gospel of Paul is at odds with the teaching of Jesus. How is this argument articulated?

This is a complex and controversial topic that has been debated by scholars and theologians for centuries. There is no definitive answer, but some of the main arguments are:

Some believe that Paul's gospel of grace and justification by faith contradicts Jesus' gospel of the kingdom of God and obedience to the law. They claim that Paul distorted or ignored the teachings of Jesus, and introduced new doctrines that were not in line with the original message of Jesus and his Jewish followers.


Some believe that Paul's gospel of Christ's death and resurrection as the core of salvation history differs from Jesus' gospel of God's reign as the fulfillment of Israel's hopes. They argue that Paul focused more on the person and work of Jesus, while Jesus focused more on the will and action of God.

Some believe that Paul's gospel of inclusion of the Gentiles and freedom from the law opposes Jesus' gospel of Israel's restoration and observance of the law. They assert that Paul compromised or abandoned the Jewish identity and heritage of Jesus and his followers, and created a new religion that was detached from its Jewish roots.

These are some of the main ways that some people argue that the gospel of Paul is at odds with the teaching of Jesus. However, there are also many others who defend the harmony and continuity between Paul and Jesus, and who seek to reconcile their apparent differences by considering their historical, cultural, and theological contexts. Ultimately, this is a matter of interpretation and faith, and one that requires careful study and respectful dialogue.

Athens was one of the strategic targets in Paul’s mission. The market-place in Athens was overlooked by the Acropolis (background left) and Areopagus (background right), from which the Court where Paul argued took its name.

PAUL

Michael A. Smith

Paul was bom into a Jewish family in Tarsus, where his parents were Roman citizens. He was a strict Pharisee, and even as a young man was outstanding in his orthodox beliefs and in his hatred of Christians. He was present at the stoning of Stephen, and was commissioned by the High Priest to arrest Christians at Damascus. Paul was converted through a vision of the risen Christ on his way to Damascus.

Temporarily blinded, he was befriended by a Christian called Ananias, and when cured he began to preach Christ in Damascus. However, attempts were made against his life, and he had to escape by being lowered down the city wall in a basket. After a spell in Arabia, Paul may have returned to Damascus, but later came to Jerusalem, where he was befriended by Barnabas and introduced to Peter. Further Jewish threats against his life forced him to flee again, and he returned to Tarsus.

There followed a period of roughly ten years about which little is known; but Paul must have been active in Christian work, for when the Gentile mission began to flourish at Antioch, Barnabas summoned him from Tarsus to join in the work. Paul visited Jerusalem again, taking famine-relief funds, and discussed the Gentile mission with Peter. Then Paul began the evangelistic work which made him the most outstanding Christian missionary of the first century.

He went with Barnabas and John Mark to Cyprus and Central Asia Minor, founding a number of churches. On his return he had a violent disagreement with Peter at Antioch about how far Gentiles had to accept Jewish customs when they became Christians. However, this question was settled soon after at the Council of Jerusalem (Acts 15).

Paul now set out again, this time with Silas, and they travelled through Asia Minor and crossed into Macedonia. Further successful missionary work followed, especially in Macedonia, Corinth and Ephesus. After another visit to Jerusalem, Paul left with Timothy for further evangelistic work, finally returning to Jerusalem with money collected for the poor Christians there.

On his arrival, Paul was seized by a Jewish mob and would have been lynched, but for the prompt intervention of the Roman garrison. He was kept in protective custody at Caesarea for two years by the Roman governor Felix, whose successor, Festus, suggested that Paul be tried at Jerusalem. But Paul refused to face such a biassed court and appealed to the Roman Emperor for justice. Paul was taken under escort to Rome, surviving a shipwreck at Malta on the way.

After two years in Rome (at which point the account in Acts ends) Paul was probably released and spent further time in missionary work before being martyred on a second visit to Rome during Nero’s persecution of AD 64. Paul’s surviving letters are found in the New Testament.
Galatians was probably written before the Council of Jerusalem. 1and 2 Thessalonians date from Paul’s first journey into Greece; Romans and 1 and 2 Corinthians come from his last spell in Greece before his arrest at Jerusalem. Philippians, Colossians, Ephesians and Philemon were probably written from Rome during Paul’s first imprisonment (although some scholars date them from an earlier imprisonment in Ephesus). 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus were probably written after Paul’s first stay in Rome.
Paul’s letters were highly valued during his lifetime, and were probably collected together soon after his death. In 1 Clement (written about AD 95) they are already accepted on an equal basis with other Scripture. They were certainly in their present collected form by the time of Marcion (about AD 140).

Paul’s theology was not well understood in the period immediately after his death. This was partly because the heretic Marcion rejected the Old Testament and much that was Jewish in the New Testament, and made great use of Paul’s writings to support his own ideas. As long as Marcion’s heresy was a threat, mainstream Christian teachers did not stress many of Paul’s distinctive doctrines, such as law and grace. Augustine was the first to give full weight to Paul’s theology.

Did Jesus Foretell a Human Successor Rather Than the Holy Spirit?

Certain scholars propose that Jesus may have foretold his successor, the Paraclete, as a human prophet rather than the Holy Spirit. This interpretation arises from a detailed analysis of biblical passages, particularly John 16, verse 13, where Jesus states, “For he will not speak on his own, but he will speak whatever he hears.” Scholars argue that this description more closely aligns with the characteristics of a human prophet who receives divine messages and conveys them to others.

Ambiguity in the Pronoun “He”

The use of the pronoun “he” in John 16, verse 13 is seen by some as ambiguous, leaving room for interpretation. Rather than exclusively referring to a non-human entity like the Holy Spirit, this phrasing could also describe a human figure. According to this view, Jesus may have alluded to a forthcoming prophetic voice of human origin, who would take on the role of guiding humanity after his departure.

The Prophetic Connection to Deuteronomy 18, verse 18

Supporters of this interpretation often point to Deuteronomy 18, verse 18, where God promises to raise up a prophet like Moses from among their brothers:
“I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brethren; I will put my words in his mouth, and he will tell them everything I command him.”

This passage is interpreted by some as a foundational prophecy that envisions a sequence of human prophets chosen by God to lead His people. These scholars suggest that Jesus may have been positioning himself as part of this prophetic lineage, with a successor yet to come who would also serve as a human intermediary between God and humanity.

Contextualizing the Prophetic Role

Proponents of this perspective argue that their interpretation aligns more closely with the broader context of biblical prophecy and teachings about prophetic figures. They see parallels between Jesus’ words in the Gospel of John and the traditional role of prophets, who act as divine messengers. A human prophet, they claim, fits the description in John 16, verse 13 better than the abstract concept of the Holy Spirit.

In this view, Jesus’ reference to the Paraclete as one who “will speak whatever he hears” underscores the idea of a human being tasked with relaying God’s message, much like the prophets of old.

Conclusion

This interpretation remains a point of theological debate. While mainstream Christian tradition identifies the Paraclete with the Holy Spirit, the idea that Jesus could have been referring to a human prophet invites further reflection on the nature of prophecy and succession in biblical theology. For those who adhere to this interpretation, the notion of a human Paraclete offers a fresh perspective on the continuation of divine guidance after Jesus’ earthly ministry.

The Servant in the messianic prophecy of Isaiah in Chapter 42 and the Paraclete or the Spirit of truth in the prophetic words of Jesus in the Gospel of John chapter 16 verse 13 are the reference to the identification of the Prophet like Moses predicted by Moses in Deuteronomy in Chapter 18 verse 18.

The scholars of the dead sea scrolls style him as a prophetic Messiah or Messianic prophet.

This new Moses, prophesied by Moses, elaborated by Isaiah, proclaimed by Jesus and awaited by the Samaritans is none other than the Prophet of Islam.

Allah in the Quran testifies to the fact that Muhammad is that prophet. Allah says in Sura 7 verse 157:

Those who follow the Messenger, the unlettered prophet, whom they find written in what they have of the Torah and the Gospel, who enjoins upon them what is right and forbids them what is wrong and makes lawful for them the good things and prohibits for them the evil and relieves them of their burden and the shackles which were upon them. So they who have believed in him, honored him, supported him and followed the light which was sent down with him - it is those who will be the successful.