The Prophecy of Hagar and Its Fulfillment: A Comparative Analysis of Genesis 21:18 and Isaiah 60:7

There is a belief that the prophecy of Hagar in Genesis 21, verse 18, holds more weight than Isaiah 60, verse 7, which is linked to and completes the former. How is this understanding conveyed?

The belief that the prophecy of Hagar in Genesis 21, verse 18, holds more weight than Isaiah 60, verse 7, which is linked to and completes the former, can be understood through a close examination of the biblical texts and their contexts. Here’s how this understanding is conveyed:

1. Genesis 21, verse 18 (The Prophecy of Hagar).

This verse is part of the story where God speaks to Hagar after she and her son, Ishmael, are sent away by Abraham. Hagar is distraught, fearing for her son’s life in the desert.

The verse reads: Arise, lift up the lad, and hold him in thine hand; for I will make him a great nation."

This prophecy directly promises that Ishmael will become a great nation. This is a foundational promise, as it assures Hagar of her son’s future and his importance in God’s plan.

2. Isaiah 60, verse 7 (Completion of the Prophecy).

This chapter of Isaiah deals with the future glory of Zion, depicting a time of great prosperity and the gathering of nations to honor God.

The verse reads: "All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered together unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee: they shall come up with acceptance on mine altar, and I will glorify the house of my glory."

Both Kedar and Nebaioth are descendants of Ishmael. This verse indicates the fulfillment and continuation of the promise given to Hagar, showing that Ishmael's descendants will play a significant role in the future worship and honor of God.

3. Interconnection and Weight:

The prophecy in Genesis 21, verse 18, is seen as having "more weight" because it is the initial divine promise regarding Ishmael, establishing his importance and future. It is a direct communication from God to Hagar at a crucial moment.

Isaiah 60, verse 7, is viewed as the completion or continuation of this promise. It confirms and elaborates on the fulfillment of God’s plan for Ishmael’s descendants, showing their eventual integration into the worship of God and their contribution to the glory of Zion.

The "weight" of Genesis 21, verse 18, lies in its foundational nature, while Isaiah 60, verse 7, provides a more detailed and expanded vision of the fulfillment of that initial promise.

This understanding is conveyed by recognizing that the original promise to Hagar is the cornerstone of the prophecy concerning Ishmael and his descendants.

The later prophetic vision in Isaiah builds upon this foundation, demonstrating the fulfillment of God's promise in a broader and more comprehensive way. Therefore, while Isaiah 60, verse 7 is significant in its completion of the prophecy, Genesis 21, verse 18, holds a primary and foundational weight in the narrative.

Genesis 21:16

And she went, and sat her down over against him a good way off, as it were a bowshot: for she said, Let me not see the death of the child. And she sat over against him, and lift up her voice, and wept.

Some believe that Isaiah 60, verse 7, is related to the Hajj ritual, and is the fulfillment of Hagar’s prophecy regarding Ishmael in Genesis 21, verse 18. How is this interpretation presented?

This is an interesting question. The interpretation that Isaiah 60, verse 7, is related to the Hajj ritual and the fulfillment of Hagar's prophecy regarding Ishmael is based on the following assumptions:

The verse reads:

“All the flocks of Kedar will be gathered to you, The rams of Nebaioth will serve you; They will go up on My altar with acceptance, And I will glorify My glorious house.”

The flocks of Kedar and the rams of Nebaioth in Isaiah 60, verse 7, refer to the descendants of Ishmael, who was the son of Abraham and Hagar, and the ancestor of the Arabs. Kedar and Nebaioth were two of Ishmael's sons (Genesis 25, verse 13).

The altar and the glorious house mentioned in Isaiah 60, verse 7, refer to the Kaaba. The Kaaba is a sacred building in Mecca that has a cube shape. Muslims believe it was constructed by Abraham and Ishmael. It serves as the direction of prayer and is also the destination for the Hajj pilgrimage.

The acceptance of the offerings on the altar and the glorification of the house in Isaiah 60, verse 7, refer to Muslims performing their Hajj, known as the Feast of Sacrifice. This sacrifice is performed in remembrance of Prophet Abraham's willingness to sacrifice his son Ishmael and as a demonstration of submission to Allah's will.

Furthermore, it is a prophecy of God's acceptance and blessing of the Ishmaelites, who worship Him at the Kaaba in sincerity and submission, as He promised Hagar in Genesis 21, verse 18, "I will make him into a great nation."

This interpretation is presented by some Muslim scholars and commentators, who see it as a proof of the truth and validity of Islam and the Hajj ritual.

The Unnamed Son of Abraham's Sacrifice in the Quran

In the Quran, the specific name of the son to be sacrificed by Abraham is not mentioned. Thus it signifies that the name of Isaac in Genesis 22, verse 2, is nothing but a scribal interpolation. What is the explanation for this argument?

The argument that the Quran's omission of the specific name of the son to be sacrificed by Abraham signifies that the name of Isaac in Genesis 22, verse 2, is a scribal interpolation is a viewpoint held by some scholars, but it is not universally accepted within the field of biblical studies or Islamic theology. This argument is based on textual and historical analysis and often arises in discussions about the relationship between the Quran and the Bible.

Here's a brief overview of the argument:

1. Quranic account: In the Quran, the story of Abraham's willingness to sacrifice his son is mentioned in Surah As Saffat (Chapter 37), but the specific name of the son is not provided. This omission has led some scholars to argue that the Quran intentionally avoids naming the son to prevent any confusion or dispute regarding the identity of the son.

2. Biblical account: In the Book of Genesis (Genesis 22, verse 2), the son to be sacrificed is identified as Isaac. This is a well-known account in both Jewish and Christian traditions.

3. Argument: Some scholars propose that the Quranic omission of the son's name suggests that the original, unaltered biblical account did not specify the son's name, and the name Isaac was added later through scribal interpolation in the biblical text.

4. Quranic Interpretation:
The Quranic narrative does not explicitly name the son of the near sacrifice, but Islamic tradition and many Muslim scholars have historically identified him as Ishmael. This belief is supported by the chronological events in the Quran, indicating that the promise of Isaac's birth was made after the account of sacrifice, suggesting that Ishmael was the likely candidate for sacrifice.

It's important to note that this argument is not universally accepted, and there is ongoing debate among scholars regarding the relationship between the Quran and the Bible. Islamic tradition generally does not delve into such textual criticism but rather focuses on the theological and moral aspects of the story.

Muslim pilgrims circle the Kaaba, the cubic building at the Grand Mosque in the Muslim holy city of Mecca, Saudi Arabia

Here are some notable quotes from orientalists and Western scholars about the Islamic Hajj:

1. Richard Burton (19th Century)

Richard Burton, an English explorer and orientalist, famously disguised himself as a Muslim to perform the Hajj in 1853. In his book “Personal Narrative of a Pilgrimage to Al-Madinah and Meccah”, he wrote:
The Hajj, or pilgrimage to Mecca, is one of the most remarkable institutions of the human race. No other religious rite of any nation involves such a journey, such hardships, or such rewards."

2. Ignaz Goldziher (19th-20th Century)

Ignaz Goldziher, a Hungarian scholar of Islamic studies, noted the significance of Hajj in shaping Muslim identity. He wrote in “Muslim Studies”:
The pilgrimage, one of the five pillars of Islam, symbolizes not only the unity of Muslims but also serves as a unique religious experience, combining devotion, reflection, and universal brotherhood."

3. Montgomery Watt (20th Century)

W. Montgomery Watt, a Scottish historian and professor of Arabic and Islamic studies, emphasized the universality of the Hajj:
The Hajj is a profound demonstration of the oneness of the Muslim Ummah (community), a practical expression of the equality of all Muslims before God, regardless of their ethnic, racial, or social backgrounds."

4. William Lane (19th Century)

William Lane, a British Orientalist and translator of “The Thousand and One Nights”, described the communal and spiritual aspect of Hajj in “An Account of the Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians”:
The pilgrimage to Mecca is not only an act of religious devotion but also a powerful expression of Muslim unity and the egalitarian spirit inherent in the Islamic faith."

5. Karen Armstrong (21st Century)

Karen Armstrong, a British author and scholar of comparative religion, highlighted the historical continuity and spiritual importance of the Hajj in her book “Islam: A Short History”:
Hajj, for centuries, has remained a central, unifying force in the Muslim world. It brings together people of every race, language, and culture, in a shared act of worship and submission to God.

6. Snouck Hurgronje (19th Century)

C. Snouck Hurgronje, a Dutch scholar who lived in Mecca and studied Islamic rituals, commented on the Hajj’s socio-political significance:
The Hajj plays a vital role not only in religious life but also in the dissemination of ideas and the strengthening of political and social bonds among the diverse Islamic communities across the globe."

These orientalists, through their unique perspectives, provide insights into the religious, social, and political dimensions of the Hajj, emphasizing its role in unifying Muslims and deepening their faith.

The Fulfillment of Prophecy: The Jewish Rabbi's Admiration for Islam's Sacrificial Legacy

Religious traditions frequently assert their divine fulfillment, searching for validation of their legitimacy and divine favor within their scriptures. A notably significant moment in Islamic history illustrates this dynamic—when a Jewish rabbi came to Caliph ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb with a remarkable confession: “If a verse like this had been revealed to us Jews, we would have declared the day of its revelation a festival day.” The verse in question is from Surah al-Mā’idah (5:3):

“This day I have perfected for you your religion, completed My favor upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion.”

This Quranic declaration came during the Prophet Muhammad’s final pilgrimage (Ḥajj), marking the formal completion of Islam as a revealed religion. But why would a Jewish rabbi regard this verse with such admiration—perhaps even envy? To understand this, we must explore a prophetic verse from the Hebrew Bible, found in Isaiah 60:7, and analyze how Islamic rituals, particularly the Ḥajj, embody the prophetic vision better than the expectations of either Judaism or Christianity.

Isaiah 60:7 – A Sacrificial Vision Involving Arabs

The Hebrew verse in Isaiah reads:

“All the flocks of Kedar shall be gathered unto thee, the rams of Nebaioth shall minister unto thee: they shall come up with acceptance on Mine altar, and I will glorify the house of My glory.”
(Isaiah 60:7)

This verse envisions a time when the descendants of Kedar and Nebaioth, two sons of Ishmael (Genesis 25:13), will offer sacrifices acceptable to God. The mention of “Mine altar” and “house of My glory” is generally understood by Jewish commentators to refer to the Temple in Jerusalem, where animal sacrifices were once offered according to the Torah.

Yet, the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE left a void in Jewish religious life. Without the altar, the sacrificial system central to the Mosaic covenant could no longer be practiced. Jews have since longed for the rebuilding of the Third Temple, expecting the resumption of sacrificial rites in fulfillment of such prophetic verses.

But here lies the tension: the sacrificial act involving the Ishmaelite tribes—Arabs from the lineage of Kedar and Nebaioth—has not been realized in Judaism. Instead, it is in Islam’s Ḥajj rituals, especially the ʿEid al-Aḍḥā sacrifice, that this prophecy seems to find a living expression.

Islam’s Living Sacrifice: A Fulfillment of Isaiah?

During the annual pilgrimage in Mecca, Muslims from all over the world—many of them literal descendants of Ishmael—participate in animal sacrifices in remembrance of Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice his son (identified in Islam as Ishmael, not Isaac). These animals are offered near the Kaʿbah, the sanctuary Muslims believe was originally built by Abraham and Ishmael.

The connection becomes theologically provocative:

Kedar and Nebaioth: Represent Ishmaelite tribes, settled in the Arabian Peninsula.
Offerings accepted on the altar: The animals offered during Ḥajj are intended as acts of devotion to God, distributed to the poor in a ritual of divine acceptance.
“House of My glory”: In Islamic interpretation, this refers not to the destroyed Temple in Jerusalem, but to the Kaʿbah in Mecca—revived and purified by Prophet Muhammad, a descendant of Ishmael.

This paradigm effectively transfers the axis of prophetic fulfillment from Jerusalem to Mecca, and from Temple Judaism to Islam. The Jewish rabbi, recognizing this shift, would understandably feel a mix of reverence and regret—hence his comment to ʿUmar.

Christianity and the Sacrifice: Atonement Without Altars

Christianity diverges sharply in interpreting sacrificial themes. For most Christians, Jesus’ crucifixion is understood as the once-for-all sacrifice that atones for sin, rendering animal offerings obsolete:

“We have been made holy through the sacrifice of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.”
(Hebrews 10:10)

Thus, Isaiah 60:7, with its focus on physical offerings and ritual sacrifice, is often spiritualized or placed in an eschatological future. Some Christian theologians believe it refers to Arab conversion to Christianity in the end times, where the imagery of Kedar and Nebaioth signifies a gentile embrace of the Gospel.

Yet, the explicit association with animal sacrifice, a practice explicitly abandoned in Christian theology, remains problematic for this interpretation. Islam, by contrast, continues the sacrificial rites within a monotheistic framework that maintains Abrahamic purity and the legacy of Ishmael.

The Quranic Rebuttal: Abraham Was Neither Jew Nor Christian

The Qur’an addresses this theological contention directly in Surah Āl ʿImrān (3:67):

“Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but he was a monotheist, submitting to God (a Muslim), and he was not of the polytheists.”

Islam positions itself not as a new religion but as the restoration of the pure monotheism of Abraham, inclusive of the sacrificial rites and covenantal practices once diluted or abandoned by later traditions.

Conclusion: A Verse to Be Envied

The statement of the Jewish rabbi to ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb reflects a profound religious realization: Islam had fulfilled a prophecy that Jews were still awaiting. The verse in Surah 5:3, revealed during the Prophet’s final pilgrimage, proclaims the completion of divine religion and favor:

“This day I have perfected for you your religion, completed My favor upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion.”

This stands in sharp contrast to Judaism’s waiting for the Third Temple and Christianity’s departure from sacrificial rites. Islam emerges as the living continuation of Abrahamic worship—including the role of Ishmael’s descendants—thus embodying both the form and spirit of prophetic visions such as Isaiah 60:7.

In the end, it is not merely doctrinal differences, but the embodiment of prophecy in historical and living religious practice, that made that verse in the Qur’an the object of such profound rabbinic envy.